Q and A with Migliore et al.. about Hithoc and Mesothelioma in Catania, Italy

Thoracics.org follows up with Dr. Marcello Migliore from the University of Catania, on his work in the area of HITHOC and malignant pleural mesothelioma

Dr. Migliore and his team performing HITHOC
Dr. Migliore and his team performing HITHOC

As discussed in a previous post on HITHOC and Mesothelioma, Dr. Marcello Migliore and his colleagues in Catania, Italy have published results from a small pilot study on the use of HITHOC (cytoreductive surgery and intrathoracic chemotherapy) to treat malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Thoracics.org contacted Dr. Migliore to find out more about that study as well as his on-going research in this area. He was also kind enough to offer his opinions on Hope and the diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma.

On-going research on HITHOC

Dr. Marcello Migliore
Dr. Marcello Migliore

Thoracics.org: Dr. Migliore, woud you tell us more about your current research on HITHOC and mesothelioma?

Dr. Migliore: We are conduction a pilot study to compare pleurodesis with talc vs HITHOC in mesothelioma patients. Goals are quality of life and survival.

Thoracics.org: How many more patients are you hoping to enroll ?


Dr. Migliore: we hope to enroll at least 12 patients (unfortunately in almost 2 years we enrolled only 6 patients)

Thoracics.org:  Would you tell us more about eligibility criteria?

Dr. Migliore:  All patients with mesothelioma will enter the study protocol except those who cannot undergo surgery for poor performance status.

Thoracics.org:  Would you describe the procedures for our readers?

Dr. Migliore: Talc pleurodesis is performed using the uniportal VATS technique (2 cm skin incision), which is a concept that was introduced  by us already in 1998 (and published in 2001 and 2003).  As you know,  Gonzalez- Rivas  is now well known worldwide for using  the concept of uniportal technique to perform major lung resection. Pleuerectomy and decortication with HITHOC is  performed using the bi-portal VATS technique but with an skin incision of around 8 cm.

Thoracics.org:  In your preliminary paper on your last pilot study, there were a couple patients with lung cancer who were included in the HITHOC trials.  Is that the same for your current study?

Dr. Migliore:  While I feel that some patients with lung cancer could have benefited from HITHOC, for this study, the indications must be strictly limited [to patients with malignant mesothelioma only].

As you know, the largest group of patients with lung cancer are patients with more advanced cancer; stage IV lung cancer patients, and because survival  is dismal, the standard practice is no surgery except palliative procedures. But, there are selected patients in whom there is some evidence that surgery could help. For this reason my personal reaction is that,  in the near future, we should aim to prolong survival in stage IV lung cancer patients also by surgery. We are in mind to start a new study on the role of surgery in selected stage IV lung cancer patients.

Migliore and colleagues
Dr. Migliore and his colleagues from the University of Catania, Policlinico Hospital, Catania, Italy

Technical Aspects on HITHOC

Thoracics.org: Does previous pleurodesis make surgery more difficult?

Dr. Migliore: Yes, due to the development of adhesions between parietal pleura and  the chest wall, as well as between the parietal and the visceral pleura, which are really difficult to remove.  It requires delicate work using the fingers ( at the end of the operation you can have pain in fingers and fingertips!)

Thoracics.org: Does it lead to increased operating room time, or increased bleeding from adhesions?

Dr. Migliore:  While is certainly increases operating time but there is no evidence of increased bleeding but air leaks are more frequent. Intraoperatively, it is imperative to put attention to every single detail to avoid postoperative complications.

Thoracics.org: Do you find that patients with diaphragm involvement develop more post-operative complications or are more likely to develop disseminated disease ?

Dr. Migliore: That has not occurred in this group of patients but the number of patients is small, and therefore it is impossible to answer.

Other considerations

Thoracics.org: What has been the biggest obstacle in your research?

Dr. Migliore: Certainly living in a “rural” region with cultural dogmas and financial restriction for research are probably the most common obstacles to speedy clinical surgical research.

On Hope & Malignant Mesothelioma

[During a related study] “We operated two patients and one is alive after 3 years. She was 40 y.o. lady with a 15 year-old child. She had malignant pleural effusion with a peripheral lung tumor and was treated elsewhere with talc pleurodesis alone, and 6 months survival was given. We performed a parietal and visceral pleurectomy with HITHOC. She is alive (with recurrence) and her son is now 18 yo. This simple case give an explanation that an operation although “experimental, gives hope (we should not give false hope) and permits to these unfortunate patients to see light in the dark”.

Dr. Marcello Migliore, MD

Thoracic Surgeon

Section of Thoracic Surgery

Department of General Surgery & Medical Specialities

University of Catania, Policlinico Hospital

Catania, Italy

Editor’s note:  Some minor edits have been made for the sake of formatting.  Thank you to Dr. Migliore and his team.

Isik et al.. & HITHOC in patients with pleural malignancies

The actual title of the article by Ahmet Feridun Isik and his colleagues at Ganziantep University Medical School in Sejitkamil – Ganziantep, Turkey is “Intrapleural hyperthermic perfusion chemotherapy in subjects with metastatic pleural malignancies.”

As we’ve discussed in previous posts, malignant pleural effusions (MPE) are a devastating diagnosis with an exceedingly poor prognosis.  As stated by the authors, “currently palliative therapy with pleurodesis or pleurectomy / decortication is the treatment of choice in secondary MPEs. Other treatment approaches are chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy.   Unfortunately, none of these approaches provides a significant benefit for survival.”

Length of survival following the development of MPE is related to the underlying primary cancer, and primary lung cancer has the shortest survival.  However, preliminary results of other studies looking at HITHOC have shown promising results.  This is what led Isik and his team to further study the use HITHOC in malignant pleural effusion.  With their permission, and gracious assistance, we have presented information on their study here.

HITHOC or HIPEC is the administration of heated chemotherapy directly to the tissue surfaces.  Scientists believe that the addition of heat, as part of a direct application of a chemotherapeutic solution enhances the cancer-cell killing effects of the agent itself while localizing these effects to the affected body cavity.  (Versus systemic chemotherapy through an IV -into the bloodstream where the chemotherapy has direct effects on other organs like the brain).  While chemotherapy is still absorbed into the system with systemic effects, this is believed to be less than with traditional chemotherapy.

When: Study started in January of 2009 – December 2011 (for data compiled and used for publication).  Protocol is currently on-going.

Who:  Cancer patients with a node status of 1N or less with (pleural) biopsy/ cytology proven metastatic malignancies.  Patients required to have good functional status, and no distant metastases (outside of pleura) at time of inclusion in study.

Of the 19 patients – 10 had primary lung cancers (adenocarcinoma), the remainder included timoma, rabdomyosarcoma, malignant fibrous histiocitoma. (Full information available in original paper, table 1)

Comparison groups: historically matched patients from medical records June 2007 – June 2008.

How many :  19 patients for the HITHOC treatment group original research,  (11 more since paper submission in July 2012 – with a total of 28 patients receiving treatment using the protocol discussed in the study as of June 2013.)  The original group included 14 males, 5 females.

Group 2: 13 patients; 6 males, 7 females

Group 3: 12 patients; 7 male, 5 female

What was the treatment:

HITHOC group (group 1): Pleurectomy / Decortication (PD) with infusion of heated chemotherapy via chest tubes following completion of pleurectomy and decortication.

The HITHOC process:  The patients’ heads were packed with ice to prevent damage to the brain due to hyperthermia.  Normal saline was heated to 42 degrees centigrade, then infused/ circulated through pleural space via the chest tubes (ie. intrapleural infusion) for one hour (using approximately 1.2 – 3.2 liters of saline solution.)  After the saline infusion, patients received an intrapleural infusion of 300mg /m2 of cisplatin for one hour.  Patients received IV hydration for 24 hours after the procedure to prevent nephrotoxicity.  Patients also received FFP.

infusing cisplatin solution via chest tubes
infusing cisplatin solution via chest tubes

Notably, despite the morbidity and mortality of similar procedures, such as HIPEC of the abdominal cavity, none of the HITHOC group patients died intra-operatively.

the machine that regulates the temperature of the chemotherapy (to 42 degrees centigrade)
the machine that regulates the temperature of the chemotherapy (to 42 degrees centigrade)

Comparison groups:

Group 2: Talc pleurodesis – 4.5 gram talc slurry administered thru a small bore chest tube.  Since this treatment is essentially palliative in nature only (to prevent re-accumulation of effusion), we would expect this group to do the worst.

Group 3: Pleurectomy / Decortication by VATS, with excision of all apical and basal parts of parietal pleura except mediastinal and diaphragmatic sides.  Performed with patient under general anesthesia.  This is the current surgical treatment for this condition.

All patients in all groups received cisplatin- based systemic chemotherapy based on primary cancer.

Dr. A. Feridun Işık and his team perform cytoreductive surgery and the HITHOC (HIPEC) procedure
Dr. A. Feridun Işık and his team perform cytoreductive surgery and the HITHOC (HIPEC) procedure

Results:  Survival at one year (12 months)

Group 1: (HITHOC with P/D) – 57.4 %  Two patients in this group needed re-operation for additional resection due to cancer recurrence ( 1 completion pneumonectomy and 1 wedge resection).

Group 2: Talc pleurodesis  – 0.6%

Group 3: P/D – 0.8%

Median survival time:

HITHOC group: 15.6 months

Talc group (group 2): 6 months

P/D group (group 3): 8 months

Results since publication – as of June 2013:

10 of the HITHOC patients remain alive to date (6 were primary lung cancers, 4 with other metastatic cancers).

The authors report that the main complication has been  a modest rise in serum creatinine (which may indicate renal impairment/(kidney damage) but that has been remedied with the use of IV hydration.

Reference

Işık AF, Sanlı M, Yılmaz M, Meteroğlu F, Dikensoy O, Sevinç A, Camcı C, Tunçözgür B, Elbeyli L. (2013).  Respir Med. 2013 May;107(5):762-7. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2013.01.010. Epub 2013 Feb 23. Intrapleural hyperthermic perfusion chemotherapy in subjects with metastatic pleural malignancies.

 

Update:  In the summer of 2014, thoracics.org traveled to Ganziantep, Turkey to interview Dr. Isik and his colleagues about his research. 

 Additional posts on related topics