Live surgery sessions – Naples minimally invasive surgery course

Dr. Henrik Hansen on how to streamline your surgery, and Dr. Diego Gonzalez Rivas at the Live surgery sessions of the Minimally invasive surgery conference in Naples, Italy.

Monaldi Hospital  – If these walls could talk

Hospital Monaldi
Hospital Monaldi

It’s the second day of the conference at Monaldi Hospital which is located in Zona Ospedale, in the hills of Naples.  The corridors of the 800 bed, 135 year-old  former tuberculosis sanitarium give away few hints of the rich and interesting history of this institution.  Commandeered by the Allies during the second world war, and containing a small but extensive pathology museum hidden in a back office, showcasing lung disease and many of the disseminated tuberculosis cases that were cared for here, one can only be intrigued by the stories contained within such as the first specimen in the collection, a five month’s gestational fetus (in utero) of a deceased tuberculosis patient.

Dr. Majorino, thoracic surgeon (who has worked at Monaldi Hospital for over 30 years and the head of the pathology department - in the museum of pathology
Dr. Majorino, thoracic surgeon (who has worked at Monaldi Hospital for over 30 years and the head of the pathology department – in the museum of pathology

But we digress.  As intriguing as all the tales of thoracic disease past are, we are gathered here today to advance the present and change the future of thoracic surgery here at Monaldi Hospital.  As mentioned in a previous post, the surgeons here in the department of thoracic surgery have only recently adopted VATS surgery.  Now after four years of practice, it is time to perfect it.  For that reason, the first guest surgeon to perform the live demonstration today is Dr. Henrik Hansen.

Live Surgery with Drs. Hansen & Gonzalez Rivas

Dr. Henrik Hansen

Dr. Henrik Hansen
Dr. Henrik Hansen

Dr. Hansen is a Denmark native who currently operates in one of Europe’s busiest VATS programs, located in Copenhagen.  80% of all the thoracic surgeries performed at his institution, Rigshospitalet.  (In comparison, in most of Europe, VATS comprises of 52% of thoracic procedures, according to data presented by Dr. Hansen).

As the head of the minimally invasive surgery department at Righospitalet, he has mastered and streamlined the ‘traditional’ or three-port VATS approach, so there are no wasted efforts to maximize efficiency.

During a short lecture prior to surgery, Dr. Hansen discussed the literature, including a paper by WS Walker et al. in 2003, which compared cancer survival outcomes in patients undergoing VATS and standard open procedures.  In the paper, the authors unequivocally recommended VATS as the operation of choice.  It was this paper that led Dr. Hansen to aggressively pursue VATS for the majority of his patients.  This position was not echoed in the official guidelines until 2013.

slide from Dr. Hansen's presentation
slide from Dr. Hansen’s presentation

Dr. Hansen allows that not all cases should be VATS cases; he prefers to perform sleeve resections via thoracotomies instead of VATS pneumonectomies, to prevent excess tissue loss in these cases).

Interestingly enough, residents in Dr. Hansen’s program learn VATS techniques without knowing the equivalent open surgical technique.  He cites one of his thoracic surgery fellows as performing over 80 VATS procedures but only two thoracotomies.  As a surgery purist, this disturbs me in some way, but then again – by much of Dr. Hansen’s criteria, I would be labeled a traditionalist.

For the morning’s case, he is performing a left upper lobectomy.  (There are no other case details available to spectators in the auditorium)*.

He places the first port along the transverse line where the standard thoracotomy incision would normally be placed. He then triangulates the second and third ports, though only one actual trocar port is used, a 12 mm port for the camera insertion.

The “working” incision is the uppermost incision, which appears to be quite large, (but this may be a distortion due to my perspective – from a camera placed above the operating room table).  At times he uses more than one instrument in this incision – and watching him, he seems that he could easily convert to single port surgery with equal efficiency.  He almost forgets about his second port at times, and uses the remainder (3rd port) solely for the camera access.

He is precise and exacting in his movements, which is what makes his reliance on traditional VATS a little puzzling.  Habit, mainly, I suspect because the surgery proceeds as if by rote.  He really is the master of efficiency – and the case progresses quickly.

He uses ligasure for greater precision during dissection and isolation of tissue and minimizes the external torsion and retraction placed on the lung during hilar dissection, isolation and ligation of the pulmonary vasculature.  He completes the procedure by performing an extensive lymph node dissection.

*Since I was outside of the operating room for this case, there are not very many operative photos, and none of Dr. Hansen operating.

Dr. Diego Gonzalez Rivas

Naples day 2 (12)

As part of his pre-surgical lecture, “Recent advances in uniportal VATs,” Dr. Gonzalez reviewed the recent history of uniportal VATS as well as surgical tips for surgeons learning the technique.  He also reviewed some of his more recent forays into surgery including complete uniportal resections using only the harmonic scalpel, and surgery on non-intubated (and awake) patients on nasal cannula.  He discussed that the non-intubated project was a anesthesia counterpart to minimally invasive surgery.  Since the risks and complications related to thoracotomies and other large incisions have been eliminated, it’s a normal progress to advance towards less invasive anesthetic techniques (since general anesthesia is associated with serious risks such as severe hypotension, peri-operative myocardial infarction and cardiovascular collapse).  While rare, eliminating general anesthesia in many cases, greatly reduces the risk of adverse anesthesia-related events.

Surgical procedure**:  Left upper lobectomy with radial lymph node dissection for a left upper lobe peripheral nodule in a 65 year patient.

Pre-operative CT scan
Pre-operative CT scan

Surgeon: D. Gonzalez Rivas.  Assistant Surgeon: D. Amore   Scrub nurse: Guiseppe

Guiseppe, scrub nurse
Guiseppe, scrub nurse

Initial post-intubation vital signs: HR 83, NSR  B/P 90/60  Saturation 99%

1445: Initiation of patient prep (betadine).  Patient is in a side-lying position.

1510 First incision (only incision)

1515: camera inserted, initial chest cavity inspection, lung deflated.  No significant adhesions or unexpected findings.  Hilar dissection commences, with attention being given first to the pulmonary artery. By 1605, the left upper lobe branch of the pulmonary artery has been divided.

Dr. Gonzalez Rivas operating with Dr. Amore assisting.  Dr. Casazza looks on.
Dr. Gonzalez Rivas operating with Dr. Amore assisting. Dr. Casazza looks on.

1608: Bronchus stapled (resected).  Patient noted to have an incomplete fissure of the upper lobe.

By 1612: The lobe is out.  Dr. Gonzalez proceeds with radical lymph node dissection – including the  nodes of the paratracheal area/ aortapulmonary window. The surgical field is essentially dry, with small amount of liquified fat from electrocautery dissection with just minor oozing from the aortopulmonary window.  He places a small amount of surgicell in the subcarinal space, after harvesting several nodes to show the best angle of approach (posterior).

Dr. Gonzalez Rivas examines the ung specimen after removal
Dr. Gonzalez Rivas examines the lung specimen after removal

During surgery, he spends a few minutes demonstrating alternative techniques to hold and manipulate several instruments in one hand so that surgeons can minimize wasted movements.

After final inspection, Dr. Dario Amore assumes the role of primary surgeon – to place the chest tube (1653).   Lung is re-inflated, and the ventilator/ respiratory loop is used to determine that there is no air leak. Camera out of the chest at 1655.

Vital signs: HR 76, NSR  B/P 121/62  Sats 100%  No hemodynamic instability or hypotension during the case.  EBL for the case is around 90ml (+/- 10 ml due to lack of graduations on the suction canister).

Skin incision closed: 1710

By 1715: Patient is awake, extubated and able to verbal respond to commands/ questions.

**Since I was present in the operating room, I was privy to a great deal more information than audience members in the auditorium such as the pre-surgical patient review, monitor readings, etc.

VATS Group. IT

VATS group and the Italian VATS Registry..

Naples, Italy

It’s the second day of the minimally invasive surgery course at Monaldi Hospital and there are a score of Italian physicians speaking in addition to the main events – Dr. Henrik Hansen and Dr. Diego Gonzalez Rivas.

Dr. Andre Droghetti
Dr. Andrea Droghetti

One of the surgeons addressing the group this morning is Dr. Andrea Droghetti, a thoracic surgeon from Carlo Poma Hospital in Mantova, Italy.  Dr. Droghetti is here to present the latest information on the Italian VATS registry, Vatsgroup.it.

droghetti lecture

Now long-term readers know how we love a registry!  We have talked a lot about the STS thoracic database and how it is woefully underutilized, we’ve talked to other surgeons who have been involved in creating their own national databases, and we even created our own.

As we discussed during a recent interview, data collection and publication are essential for research and advancement of the specialty – and that all starts with accurate data and statistics.  But not all data collection tools are alike.

It is interesting, and encouraging to hear about the successful enrollment of 57 Italian facilities into a nationwide VATS registry to track VATS surgery and outcomes.

The database itself is pretty detailed and much more involved than the high altitude database or even STS.  There are multiple risk stratification measures as well as quality of life indicators.  The database is also designed to allow greater categorization – of pre-operative conditions, staging, procedures, and just about anything else you can think of.

the registry is extremely detailed
the registry is extremely detailed

Sounds like a great way to improve the quality of the data being used for research.  After all, plenty of surgeons in Italy are participating – and as we know, getting surgeons to participate is always difficult.  Even the STS  database is lagging with just over 215 surgeons participating.

That’s awesome.. Now if only we could get more global participation!

Unfortunately, these kinds of large-scale projects never go off without a hitch – and during the presentation, we noted several potential pitfalls.  One the major ones that Dr. Droghetti addressed was:

– Getting surgeons/ hospitals to participate

Out of 57 sites that are eligible to participate, only 44 are actually submitting data, and the data volumes have been measly – at just over 2 cases per day.  (There is certainly more than two cases being performed every day.)

It also makes you wonder about the ‘randomness’ of the cases being entered.  Maybe it’s one very diligent site entering cases everyday, or maybe it’s different sites entering their best outcomes – so the potential for data skewing seems to be there.

But since it seems like such a great project, Thoracics.org asked Dr. Droghetti to talk to us some more about this project, (translational issues during the conference made parts of the presentation unclear) and answer some additional questions.  He was nice enough to talk to Thoracics.org for a few minutes.

From our own experience, we identified several other potential problems for the registry: so we posed these problems to Dr. Droghetti for his input.

Time consuming / repetitive entries for single patient

Data has to be entered on two occasions for the registry.  The first submission takes approximately 30 minutes and the second – the post-surgical follow up – takes around ten minutes.  The nice part about the project is that the patients actually participate in the follow-up evaluation and enter their own answers for the quality of life answers.

Now the QoL stuff is pretty unique to this registry, and the two entries per patient – allows for real-time time entry instead of retrospective review (which can get pretty skewed) so these are also strengths of the project. But..

After our own adventure with data collection as well as our experiences with the STS (cardiac) database, that this also immediately identifies this study as relying on 3rd party data entry.  That’s because there is no surgeon under the sun that is going to spend that kind of time entering data when he could be seeing consults, performing surgery etc..

Third party data entry

is a dirty word in my book since it requires surgeons to rely on others to enter data about their outcomes.  It’s also a negative because in many cases, the data entry is being done by a person who is more computer literate than medically literate.  This means that they can’t always extrapolate data correctly from charts because they often don’t understand the data in the first place.  This leads to unnecessary errors which skew data.

Dr. Droghetti and his team are addressing this issue, by appointing a specific “team member” but if that team member is someone specifically hired to enter your data (and not your anesthesiologist or other invested person) – then it’s no different from the third-party data entry systems we’ve seen before with STS (so expect similar problems).  Computerized data entry tends to be tedious – and that might also be leading to the low participation rates we are seeing.  With the amount of data to be entered, 30 minutes of drop down boxes might actually translate to more than an hour (just take a look at the cardiology PCI registry).

Hopefully these issues won’t impede Dr. Droghetti and his colleagues in their efforts.  We wish them luck and look forward to seeing more publications based on this data.

Minimally invasive surgery course in Naples at Hospital Monaldi (April 23 – 24th, 2015)

Minimally invasive surgery course in Naples at Hospital Monaldi (April 23 – 24th, 2015)

object035

Munich airport, Germany

I am on the last leg of a long journey to the beautiful southern Italian coastal city of Naples.  Best known for its claim as the home of pizza and the nearby ruins of Pompeii, for the next few days, the department of thoracic surgery at Hospital Monaldi will be hosting surgeons (and one wee writer) from around the world for a two day course on minimally invasive and robotic surgery.

The event features live surgery demonstrations by Dr. Henrik Hansen and Dr. Diego Gonzalez Rivas, with a host of other speakers.  For more details on the V corso VATS Monaldi Napoli dr Curcio dr Amore dr Casazza click the highlighted link for the full program.

Meanwhile, I will bring readers photos and highlights from the event.

Simposia Internacional: Advances en Cancer Pulmonar y Mesotelioma

Highlights from the recent conference on Advances in Lung Cancer and Mesothelioma

Instituto Nacional de Cancero
Bogota, Colombia

Dr. Ricardo Buitrago and Dr. Juan Carlos Garzon, Thoracic Surgeons

This one day conference put on by the National Cancer Institute in Bogotá, Colombia highlighted the latest research and techniques of treating lung cancer and mesothelioma.

It was headlined by a trio of invited lecturers, Dr. Carlos Jimenez, MD,  Pulmonologist (MD Anderson, Houston, TX),  Dr. Garrett Walsh, MD, Thoracic surgeon (MD Anderson, Houston, TX) and Dr. Mark Dylewski, MD, Thoracic surgeon (Baptist Health/ South Miami Hospital – Center for Robotic Surgery).

Dr. Ricardo Buitrago (who readers will be hearing more about in the coming months) and Dr. Rafael Beltran were the moderators for the conference.

Dr. Jimenez spoke on the topics of endobranchial ultrasound and fine needle (Wang) aspiration for lymph node biopsy as an adjuvant of mediastinoscopy for cancer staging, as well as ‘medical thoracoscopy’ or pleuroscopy.  (While I will never share his views of pleuroscopy being part of the role/ scope of pulmonology – it was an interesting presentation.)

The presentations of Dr. Walsh and Dr. Dylewski served as beautiful counter-balance to each other and demonstrated the spectrum and breadth of thoracic surgery in the treatment of thoracic diseases.

Dr. Garrett Walsh and Dr. Mark Dylewski, American thoracic surgeons

While Dr. Dylewski presented the latest data from his experiences performing over 355 cases by robotic approach, Dr. Walsh spoke about performing large open cases with an interdisciplinary team to treat later stage cancers (T3, T4 respectively) and the ability to resect cases that are often referred for medical treatment due to local metastasis to adjacent organs.

Dr. Walsh delivering presentation

Other notable speakers included Dr. Stella Martinez who debated the advisability of surgical treatment of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM) in response to another presentation by Dr. Walsh, as well as a discussion by Dr. Humberto Varela of the utility of specific diagnostic modalities for the detection and staging of malignant pleural mesothelioma.

a thoracic surgeon from Cali

Using social media & technology to promote specialty practice

Cirugia de Torax and the role of social media in the promotion of specialty practice.

“Using social media & technology to promote specialty practice” is the title of the abstract submitted (and accepted) for presentation at the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners (AANP) national conference in June 2012.  As part of this presentation, we will be talking about and presenting information about the Cirugia de Torax website and associated social media.  We will be presenting information about the evolution from the first post last spring, to the development of our first (and basic) Android app to more sophisticated applications such as the STS General database application.

We will also be presenting statistics – website visits, numbers of subscribers, numbers of applications downloaded, emails received as well as where our readers come from.  So I wanted to take a moment to thank everyone who has made this project a success;  to all of the surgeons and thoracic surgery specialists (nurse practitioners, physician’s assistants, nurses, etc.) that invited me into their operating rooms, made time in their schedules for interviews, phone calls, and answered my many emails.

Thank you to all of my readers – especially the medical / nursing students and patients out there that requested or suggested topics or articles.  (I never knew how fascinated we all are with RATS (robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery) until I started receiving all of those emails.  So thank you for the gracious and generous feedback.

Lastly, if you are in Orlando, Florida area this June – I’d like to invite you to stop by and introduce yourself. (I’ll be posting more details as the date nears.)

K. Eckland

Update: 23 June 2012

27th AANP conference

Social Media Handouts – with information about Cirugia de Torax and other web blogs, websites, and social media by health care professionals (primarily nurse practitioners).